Mileikowsky v. HCA, West Hills Hospital Medical Center Court of Appeal State of California, Second Appellate District, Division 8 Case No. BS091943 Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles Case # BS091943 Supreme Court of California Case # S156986 Amicus Brief Filed by the Union of American Physicians and Dentists (UAPD) in Support of Petitioner/Apellant Gil N Mileikowsky, M.D. - filed in the Supreme Court of California, 6/24/2008 Read Brief Read Application to File Brief Answer Brief on the Merits - filed by Petitioner/Apellant Gil N Mileikowsky, M.D. - filed in the Supreme Court of California, 6/10/2008 Read Brief HCA, West Hill's Opening Brief on the Merits - filed in the Supreme Court of California, 3/27/2008 Read Brief Supreme Court of California Grants Petition for Review - 12/12/2007 Read More Letter Sent to Supreme Court of California in Reply to Below Amicus Letters and in Support of Petitioner/Apellant Gil Mileikowsky, MD - 11/30/2007 Download PDF File Amicus Letters Sent to Supreme Court of California in Support of Defendants/Respondants HCA, West Hills Hospital - 11/2007 Read Letters Reply to Answer to Petition for Review - filed by Defendants/Respondants HCA, West Hills Hospital - filed in the Supreme Court of California Case No. S156986 - 11/08/2007 Download PDF File Answer to Petition for Review - filed by Petitioner/Apellant Gil N Mileikowsky, M.D. - filed in the Supreme Court of California Case No. S156986 - 10/29/2007 Download PDF File Petition for Review - filed by Defendants and Respondents West Hills Hospital - filed in the Supreme Court of California Case No. S156986 - 10/04/2007 Download PDF File Court of Appeal Opinion following rehearing - reverses Superior Court decision and remands with directions - 8/27/2007 Download PDF File Apellant's Petition for Rehearing. filed 6/18/2007 in Court of Appeal State of California Download PDF File Respondents' Petition for Rehearing. filed 6/21/2007 in Court of Appeal State of California Download PDF File Court of Appeal reverses Superior Court decision and remands with directions - 6/8/2007 Download PDF File Court of Appeal asks for additional briefing regarding: "Business and Professions Code section 809.2, subdivision (b) provides that the hearing officer shall not be entitled to vote. What effect, if any, does this have on the power of the hearing officer to terminate the hearing convened under Business and Professions Code section 809.2?" Read entire letter from Court of Appeal of April 12, 2007 Apellant's Reply to Court of Appeal's request for additional briefing regarding Business and Professions Code Section 809.2 - 4/25/2007 Download PDF File Respondant's Reply to Court of Appeal's request for additional briefing regarding Business and Professions Code Section 809.2 - 4/26/2007 Download PDF File Apellant's Reply Brief filed 1/19/2007, Court of Appeal State of California, Second Appellate District, Division 8 Download PDF File Respondents' Brief filed 10/30/2006, Court of Appeal State of California, Second Appellate District, Division 8 Download PDF File Apellant's Opening Brief filed 6/2/2006, Court of Appeal State of California, Second Appellate District, Division 8 Download PDF File Judgement - 07/25/2005 Download PDF File Reply to Respondents' Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandate - 03/14/2005 Download PDF File Respondents' Opposition to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Mandate - 02/28/2005 Download PDF File Petitioner's Opening Brief in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate - 01/21/2005 Download PDF File Supplemental Declaration of Gil N. Mileikowsky, M.D. In Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate - 01/21/2005 Download PDF File Petitioner's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate - 09/03/2004 Download PDF File Petition for Writ of Mandate - 08/18/2004 Download PDF File